Call for Papers

1. Important deadlines

Abstract submission: 1 March 2011 DEADLINE EXTENDED TO 15 MARCH
Evaluation of abstracts: 2-17 March 2011 DEADLINE EXTENDED TO 30 MARCH
Confirmation of abstract acceptance: 18 March 2011 31 MARCH FOR ALL ABSTRACTS
Full papers submission: 1 June 2011

Abstracts will be uploaded directly to the conference online system that can be accessed at: https://events.viajesiberiacongresos.com/ei/getdemo.ei?id=510&s=_6Z40UO0UK
Student papers will be tagged with the mention ‘Student’ and will be considered for the “Best Student Paper Award” of the conference.

2. Instructions for authors

Abstracts: min. 1,000 – max. 1,500 words, excluding references, including: 1) Subtheme; 2) Title; 3) Max. 5 keywords; 4) Brief presentation of the state-of-the-art, methodology, findings and interpretation, conclusions, policy implications and directions for further research. Abstracts must not contain information about the authors – this information will be provided in the accompanying email.

Full papers: max. 8,000 words, excluding references, including: 1) Sub-theme; 2) Title; 3) Author information (institutional affiliation, contact details, 150 words bio); 4) Max. 5 keywords; 5) Introduction, state-of-the-art, methodology, findings and interpretation, conclusions, policy implications and directions for further research.

Document format: Word or PDF file, Arial 10 or Times New Roman 12 font.

3. Evaluation

The abstracts will be double-blind peer-reviewed by the TH9 Scientific Committee. Evaluation criteria include: (i) Relevance to the conference subthemes; (ii) Methodology; (iii) Originality; (iv) Clarity of the argument; (v) Paper structure and coherence; (vi) Policy relevance. Accepted papers will be considered for publication in international journals

Disclaimer: the following paragraph must be included on the cover page of the paper to indicate acceptance of the copyright terms:

Copyright of the paper belongs to the author(s). Submission of a paper grants permission to the Triple Helix 9 Scientific Committee to include it in the conference material and to place it on relevant websites. The Scientific Committee may invite papers accepted for the conference to be considered for publication in Special Issues of selected journals.

4. Conference sub-themes

We are pleased to invite submissions on the following sub-themes. Students are particularly encouraged to contribute.

1. Silicon Valley – Exploring the ‘works of the engine’

1.1.  History and conditions for success (academic entrepreneurship, university-industry relations, firm formation, government-supported R&D and industrial policy, concentration of venture capital, availability of managerial talent, technical and business skills, trust, networks)

1.2.  From ambitious start-up to high-tech giant – what does it take?

1.3.  Forging tomorrow’s world – what are the “dynamos of the new economy”?

1.4.  Multinational corporations: models for regional participation (satellites, outposts, etc.), recruitment and international mobility, cross-cultural strategies, tools and indicators for multi-national and multi-sector initiatives, knowledge spillovers.

1.5.  Aligning legal and financial structures for open and proprietary innovation in a global market – intellectual property, human resources, tax incentives, venture capital, etc.

1.6.  Effective uses of market intelligence for inspiring and implementing government policies, educational programs and business planning.

1.7.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): the challenges of high performance and high integrity

1.8.  Silicon Valley links with other international technology conurbations

1.9.  Silicon Valley myths (e.g. the ‘heroic entrepreneur’).

2. Triple Helix and innovation for development

2.1.  Transferability of innovation models and systems (from developed to developing country, region, innovation system, development stage): replication vs. adaptation to local conditions

2.2.  Enabling conditions for transfer: organizational context, financial and human resources, legal framework, intellectual property regimes, leadership and vision, culture, economic history, etc.

2.3.  Transferability of ‘Bayh-Dole Regime’ to developing countries

2.4.  The rise of science and innovation in world regions (Asia, Latin America, Africa, Central and Eastern Europe transition countries, Australia and New Zealand): change and diversity

2.5.  Policies and strategies for reverse engineering (import substitution) and the “bottom-of-the-pyramid”

2.6.  Relevance of the Triple Helix model for sustainable development challenges (Climate change and clean energy; Sustainable transport; Sustainable consumption and production; Conservation and management of natural resources; Public health; Social inclusion, demography and migration; Global poverty).

3. Triple Helix ecosystems and regional development

3.1. Triple Helix models: drivers, dynamics, public policy

3.2. Research-intensive clusters, technopoles, Science Cities

3.3. Innovative SMEs, spin-offs and regional development

3.4. Transferring technology and knowledge to SMEs: the role of government and Higher Education Institutions, financial instruments creating a culture of knowledge-based SMEs.

3.5. Entrepreneurial university roles: partner in regional systems of governance, player in regional technological and commercial advances, e.g. leading and supporting sector-specific initiatives

3.6. Regional innovation ecosystems:  are they possible in small and remote regions?

3.7. ‘Smart specialization’ as a strategy to align regional innovation strategies: how to construct comparative advantages, role of institutional settings for research, education and innovation.

3.8. Role of creative arts, industries and individuals in regional renewal

4. Triple Helix and the globalization of innovation

4.1. How national are National Systems of Innovation?

4.2. Internationalization of emerging (‘born-global) local companies

4.3. Incentives/barriers to the mobility and retention of human resources for innovation (brain drain, brain gain).

4.4. Making better use of diasporas: as ‘transmission belt’ for innovation models to their home countries, path-to-markets from home to international markets,  social support systems for entrepreneurs. Government policies to stimulate return of diasporas to the home countries and foster collaboration with the home countries.

5. Government role in Triple Helix interactions

5.1. From passive facilitator to active player (government as an entrepreneur)

5.2. Good practice, bad practice: learning from evaluations of government-funded innovation programs in support of innovation, technology transfer and entrepreneurship

5.3. Reforming Public Research Organizations to cope with the innovation challenge: instruments, models, experiences

6. Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: ‘traditional’ and new science-industry interface organizations, mechanisms, organizational designs, networks, etc.

6.1. Start-ups, spin-offs, science parks, business incubators, technology transfer offices, joint research projects, in-firm (company) universities, business acceleration centers, corporate incubation, university proof-of-concept centers, etc.

6.2. Individual and collective entrepreneurship

6.3. Dual roles of people (e.g. Professors of Practice)

6.4. Entrepreneurship training for students (including Triple Helix knowledge, culture)

6.5. Academic and corporate patenting, international rules and agreements surrounding patents, intellectual property and technology transfer

6.6. New methods and analytical tools for technology transfer evaluation (evaluation of technology transfer offices)

6.7. Role of informal knowledge transfer (i.e. undertaken without contractual agreements between university researchers and government agencies or companies) in technology transfer

7. New forms of financing innovation

7.1. Business Angels (individuals and networks), limited partners

7.2. Venture Capital (Government Venture Capital interventions for regional innovation, successful case studies of government-leveraged venture investment, University Venture Capital funds, regional Venture Capital funds)

8. The Triple Helix and human resources for innovation and technology transfer labor markets

8.1. Recruitment of staff from industry and the public sector (local, national, global) by Universities

8.2. Recruitment of staff and students from universities (local, national, global) by industry and by the public sector

8.3. Disciplinary patterns of mobility, collaboration and careers in innovation and tech transfer

8.4. National and international student/academic technology transfer and mobility programs for continuing professional development

9. Triple Helix indicators

9.1. Indicators of mobility across Triple Helix institutional spheres (local, national, international)

9.2. Indicators for the measurement of  the Knowledge, Innovation and Consensus Spaces

10. Innovation in the global economic crisis

10.1. Government intervention to support innovation as a strategy of recovery from economic crisis

10.2. Economic crisis effects on innovation strategies in large firms and SMEs

10.3. Economic crisis effects on university innovation strategies

11. Triple Helix and society

11.1. Public understanding of and societal inputs into science and innovation

11.2. TH interactions with non-profit and public service organizations (schools, community groups, health organizations, etc.)

11.3. Interactions between Triple Helix actors and researchers in the social sciences, humanities and fine arts, and their influence on ‘transdisciplinary’ problem-oriented research

11.4. Triple Helix in services innovation

12. The Gender dimension in science and technology, innovation, technology transfer and entrepreneurship, venture capital

12.1. Contribution of women to scientific breakthroughs and technological advancement: illuminating the hidden history  of success

12.2. Role of government, industry and university policies in encouraging women in S&T education and careers

12.3. Work-life balance

12.4. Gender diversity in innovation:

  • Has it been stimulated or inhibited by the globalization of high-technology and new innovation models/interfaces (open innovation, crowd sourcing by Web 2.0 technologies, online consensus spaces)?
  • Positive action measures (government, industry and university policies and initiatives) to foster gender diversity in innovation

12.5. Women in technological innovation:

  • Are women more likely to participate in technological innovation within a social impact framework (e.g. clean energy/green tech, global poverty for the new sustainable development challenges)?
  • Good practice in university, industry, and government for enhancing women’s engagement in technological innovation: how can it be successfully institutionalized?

12.6.  Women in technology transfer and entrepreneurship

  • Gender gap in patenting
  • Student mentoring in technology transfer: is it different for male and female students?
  • Women in spinoffs and knowledge-based SMEs (as employees or entrepreneurs)
  • Women-led high-technology  ventures: financing, growth

12.7.  Gender in Silicon Valley:

  • International comparison between Silicon Valley and other clusters in terms of low participation of women in innovation and patenting – lessons for Silicon Valley
  • Women’s advancement in Silicon Valley high-tech companies was found to be based on management positions rather than on individual contributor positions. What are the mechanisms leading to this gender stratification?
  • Silicon Valley prides itself on being a “meritocracy”, and yet evidence of gender bias in its institutions is mounting. What are the consequences of the meritocracy culture in fostering or hindering gender diversity?

13. Management and capacity building for effective engagement in Triple Helix partnerships: challenges and possible solutions

13.1. Skills, knowledge and experience required for building effective partnerships between universities, business, government and the community.

13.2. Understanding, reconciling, and managing diverse expectations between Faculty staff and Senior Executives in a University environment.

13.3. Setting directions for professional development for hybrid occupations (e.g. technology transfer, science park and incubator management).

13.4. Student training in international companies, start-ups, incubators, etc.  to develop new business models for enterprises.

14. Communication of Innovation

14.1.  Emerging Innovation Communication Systems (directing attention flows among people, enterprises and institutions within innovation systems and to the outer world): corporate communication, communication in the public sector, PR firms.

14.2. Identifying and reporting on issues in innovation systems: mechanisms, organizations, challenges.

14.3. Innovation journalism: crossing borders between business, technology and societal issues. Drawing collective attention on innovation issues (‘clusters of collective attention), collective action and the way they can generate the best returns for individuals and societies.

14.4. The role of “attention workers” (actors who generate and broker attention professionally) in innovation ecosystems.

14.5. Branding universities and regions

14.6. Social media and new information flows: effects on innovation

5. Contact:

For further information, please contact:

Dr. Marina Ranga
Chair, Scientific Committee Triple Helix 9 International Conference
Senior researcher, Triple Helix Research Group, H-STAR Institute
Stanford University

Email: marina.ranga@stanford.edu
http://injo.stanford.edu/node/209

Triple Helix Conference I Amsterdam, 1996 II New York, 1998 III Rio de Janeiro, 2000 IV Copenhagen, 2002 V Turin, 2005 VI Singapore, 2007 VII Glasgow, 2009 VIII Madrid, 2010 IX Stanford, 2011 X Indonesia, 2012 XI London, 2013
Powered by WordPress
Development by Techbridge WordPress Developers Toronto